By Nancy Hudson-Rodd
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Despite the current euphoria over Burma, the reality is a depressing
picture. It is even more important now to study and write on it, and
not just about the big picture but the details.
With the help of what I would call “agents of capitalism” (scholars,
diplomats, development aid experts, representatives of international
agencies, investors, entrepreneurs etc), the land and people of Burma
are being robbed and sold off under the lie of development and
democratic change.
The state ‘civilian’ government is now being supported by many whose
interests lie in having their way with the riches of Burma. David
Cameron, for example, took ten businessmen with him to Rangoon, only as
tourists, mind you, because Britain still had some economic sanctions
in place.
There are claims that Burma, a very poor country, could benefit from
more development aid – as does Cambodia. Since the first Cambodian
General Election in 1993, over $6 billion has been provided to official
donors and hundreds of civil society organisations. Yet, citizens of
Cambodia have not been the major recipients of this aid, but government
officials, international experts, and advisers have thrived. There is a
nasty ongoing land confiscation by developers. People are displaced
from their land – just as in Burma – with no recourse to justice.
Although Cambodia is now a supposed democracy, Hun Sen still rules.
Nor is aid the answer. Real citizen involvement in creating a
country is what is needed, not just token involvement by a few. But
this is not possible in Burma.
Capitalists, businessmen, and large trading companies of the 17th
and 18th centuries opened up the world for the British colonial ruler
to step in. The Hudson Bay Company became ruler of large parts of
Canada before the Dominion of Canada, Cecil Rhodes was put in power by
the British South Africa Company to develop Rhodesia (still grants
Rhodes scholarship), and the East India Company opened up India and
Burma to the British Government. When the last Burmese king refused the
demands of the East India Company, it asked for British Government
assistance and Britain declared war.
Now Western governments are prising open new markets for their
corporations. They talk only business the market and debt, not health,
education, ecology or the common good.
The governments of the EU, Norway, Canada, the USA, and Australia
have suspended most sanctions on Burma, rewarding the ‘civilian
government’ for its democratic changes. The Australian government has
never sanctioned investment in Burma.
Yet Australian, French, American, Thai, Chinese, Indian, Russian,
Malaysian oil and gas companies currently operate there. Oil and gas
exports are the Burmese leaders’ largest source of income, amounting to
nearly US $3 Billion in the 2011-12 fiscal year. Despite this resource
wealth, the oil and gas revenues over the last decades have been
pocketed by a few corrupt military generals.
Instead of rushing in to Burma we need to study the truth of how
Western actions will affect current tensions, relationships and life
for the Burmese people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment