May 21, 2012
By: Ramon H. Royandoyan
Philippine Daily Inquirer
Inabel and binakol, the weaving traditions of the Ilocos, served as
take-off points of discussion in a forum tackling the plight of weavers
and craftsmen in Southeast Asia and China.
The three-day forum, spearheaded by the National Commission for
Culture and the Arts (NCCA), tackled issues about the economic and
cultural implications of weaving in the region.
Delegates from Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Brunei
Darussalam, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia and China were present to
showcase their respective weaving traditions.
The Philippine delegation consisted of weavers from Paoay, Sarrat, Pinili, Ifugao, Aklan and Basilan.
Jesus Peralta, anthropologist, former director of the National
Museum and Don Carlos Palanca Literary Awards Hall of Famer, talked
about the protection of intellectual property in the case of
“intangible” cultural heritage.
In this case, intellectual property refers to the entitlement of an
individual and/or a community to its cultural heritage. Intangible
cultural heritage is defined by Peralta as “being continuously
recreated by a community or an individual.”
“This definition posits the question of the ownership of intellectual rights,” said Peralta.
However, the major issue lies in traditional culture being in the
public domain. “Can it be owned? Technically, any entity claim the
culture of any segment of it be owned by any entity,” Peralta said in
his presentation.
To maintain and develop intangible cultural heritage through
individuals, Peralta added, a person’s legal status must be clearly
defined through legislative action, a relevant law, right of
attribution, and an organization.
Lastly, Peralta reiterated the difference between intangible cultural heritage and intellectual property rights.
“Intangible cultural heritage differs from intellectual because it
developed throughout generations and continues to be used and evolves
within the society it originated from,” Peralta said.
Green materials
Wanwiwat Ketsawa, director of trade promotion and business
development department of Support Arts and Crafts International Center
of the Ministry of Commerce of Thailand, said Thailand held training
programs for weavers.
“Aside from the traditional method of weaving, the weavers are
taught creating natural dyes, quality control, mixing and matching the
colors,” he said. “The weavers are also trained in weaving fabric
through green materials and recycling materials.”
Ketsawa also took note of the problems of traditional Thai weaving amid global warming and an aging society.
Charito Cabulisan-Cariaga, one of the Philippine representatives and
head of a weaving community in Paoay, Ilocos Norte, talked about the
formation of Nagbacalan Loomweavers Multi-Purpose Cooperative.
The cooperative faced the challenge of the inabel weaving tradition
facing extinction due to modernization and economic constraints. The
town’s loom-weaving cooperative started with 13 female weavers and has
now grown with 30 active members with a total asset of around P3
million, Cariaga said.
The Nagbacalan cooperative’s most notable achievement is having its
loom-weaving products showcased in an exhibit by the Center for
International Trade Expositions and Missions by a British consultant.
“The cooperative was very successful in reviving the inabel weaving
tradition because it was one of the community’s primary livelihoods,”
Cariaga said.
Noridah Johan, the delegate from Malaysian Handicraft Development
Corp., discussed the history of traditional Malaysian weaving and the
government’s attempts to make it more profitable.
Essential part
The songket, similar to the Philippines’ inabel and binakol weaving,
was given focus as an essential part of Malaysian weaving tradition.
Johan discussed the goal of the Malaysian weaving industry to
innovate the handwoven songket by incorporating modern motifs. The
ancient designs, she explained, drew from the daily life of Malaysians,
sometimes based on native plants and animals.
She said the Malaysian government had agreed to set up the National Craft Institute to support the local weaving industry.
Chinese delegate Zhou Jiu of Zhejiang University of Science and
Technology discussed the history of weaving in China, with focus on
woven-silk fabric.
The woven-silk tradition is characterized by the intricate designs
based on Chinese history. The three most notable Chinese brocades are
shu, song and yun, said Zhou.
During the forum, the delegates assessed rules and regulations of
each member country on weaving, including import and export regulations.
The forum arrived at the decision to establish a national-level
weavers’ associations in each country; strengthen regional trade
networks; and promote intellectual property rights.
The forum also resolved to raise public awareness on traditional weaving through awards and recognition of master weavers.
The delegates also visited the local weaving communities of Sarrat and Paoay in Ilocos Norte.
The three-day forum in Plaza del Norte in Ilocos Norte also featured
an exhibit of select pieces of handwoven and loom-woven fabrics from
various countries.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment