By :
Hydropower dams planned for the lower mainstem of
the Mekong River could decimate fish populations and with them the
primary source of protein for 60 million people. The impact of the dams
would extend far beyond the river, as people turn to agriculture to
replace lost calories, protein and micronutrients, according to a new
study by WWF and the Australian National University.
There are 11 planned dam projects on the Mekong mainstem, and
another 77 dams planned in the basin by 2030. The study, “Dams on the
Mekong River: Lost fish protein and the implications for land and water
resources”, looked at two scenarios: replacement of lost fish protein
directly attributable to the proposed 11 mainstem dams, and replacement
of the net loss in fish protein due to the impact of all 88 proposed
dam developments.
If all 11 planned mainstem dams were built, the fish supply would be
cut by 16 per cent, with an estimated financial loss of US$476 million
a year, according to the study. If all 88 projects were completed, the
fish supply could fall 37.8 per cent.
Study co-author Stuart Orr, freshwater manager at WWF International,
says policymakers often fail to recognize the crucial role of inland
fisheries in meeting food security. “The Mekong countries are striving
for economic growth, and they see hydropower as a driver of that
growth. But they must first fully understand and take into account the
true economic and social value of a free-flowing Mekong,” says Orr.
The lower Mekong, flowing through Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Viet
Nam, is renowned for its biological diversity, with more than 850
freshwater fish species. These fish are fundamental to diets and
economies in the region, with 80 per cent of the 60 million inhabitants
relying directly on the river for their food and livelihoods.
The report also looks at the effects on land and water as people are
forced to shift to cows, pigs, poultry and other sources to meet their
protein requirements. On top of 1,350km2 of land lost to dam
reservoirs, the countries would need a minimum of 4,863km2 of new
pasture land to replace fish protein with livestock. The high end of
the estimate if all dams were built is 24,188km2 – a 63 per cent
increase in land dedicated to livestock.
Water requirements would jump on average between 6 and 17 per cent.
But these averages mask the considerably higher figures for Cambodia
and Laos. Under scenario one, with 11 dams on the mainstem, Cambodia
would need to dedicate an additional 29-64 per cent more water to
agriculture and livestock; Laos’ water footprint would increase by
12-24 per cent. Under the second scenario, with all 88 dams, these
numbers shift dramatically, with an increase of 42-150 per cent for
Cambodia and 18-56 per cent for Laos.
“Policymakers in the region need to ask themselves where they are
going to find this additional land and water,” says Orr. “The Mekong
demonstrates the links between water, food and energy. If governments
put the emphasis on energy, there are very real consequences for food
and water – and therefore people.”
The report, published in the journal Global Environmental Change and
presented during World Water Week in Stockholm, comes at a critical
time in the debate over hydropower development in the region.
Construction work appears to be moving ahead on the controversial
Xayaburi dam in Laos, despite a decision by the intergovernmental
Mekong River Commission to halt the project pending further studies. It
would be the first of the planned dams to span the lower Mekong
mainstem.
“We hope this study can help fill some of the knowledge gaps about
the effects of the proposed dams,” says co-author Dr Jamie Pittock from
the Crawford School of Public Policy in the Australia National
University.
WWF urges the lower Mekong countries to defer a decision on the
mainstem Mekong dams for 10 years to ensure critical data can be
gathered and a decision can be reached using sound science and
analysis. WWF further advises lower Mekong countries considering
hydropower projects to prioritize dams on some Mekong tributaries that
are easier to assess and are considered to have a much lower impact and
risk.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment