AMID
cheers and the odd tear, a band of 13 women—a dowdy lot of impoverished
middle-aged mothers, homemakers, and a grandmother—were set free by a
Cambodian appeals court on June 27th. The court’s decision was welcomed
by human-rights groups as well as by local land-rights activists, who
believe the national government has taken advantage of these women as
part of a programme of evicting the poor to make way for lucrative
commercial developments.
The
youngest of the gang of 13 is 25 years old and the eldest is 72. They
were among 4,000 families evicted from their homes around Boeung Kak
lake, a natural waterway and a parcel of prime real estate near the
centre of Phnom Penh. The surrounding land was then cleared and the
lake filled to make way for an up-market housing project.
The development is supposed to be built by an extremely discreet firm called Shukaku Inc, which is owned by Lao Meng Khin, a senator for the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP), and a Chinese group, Erdos Hongjun Investment Corporation.
Some
families received a paltry mix of cash and land to move while others
received nothing. The women kept on protesting at the site, even after
they were evicted. Eventually they were arrested and on May 24th, after
a three-hour hearing, they were convicted of occupying the land in
question illegally. Each was sentenced to two-and-a-half years in jail.
Their arrest had been condemned swiftly by Amnesty International and
Human Rights Watch. They too are concerned about the prevalence of
land-grabbing, which is made all the uglier by allegations of
corruption and the deadly use of force. According to a local
human-rights group called Licadho, foreign interests—owning mines,
plantations, real-estate development firms and the like—now control
more than 22% of Cambodia’s total surface area.
But
then at a crucial juncture the “Boueng Kak 13”, as they had become
known, started to win the sympathy of ordinary Cambodians and the support of America’s secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.
Cambodia’s prime minister, Hun Sen, has responded to the growing agitation over land rights with a freeze on further land concessions
and a promise to resolve the rest of the country’s outstanding cases of
land-grabbing. This pledge did not, however, lead to any cessation in
the granting of vast tracts of land to commercial interests.
Hun
Sen took to lashing out at media accounts which reported that he had
gone back on his earlier promises. He argued that the contracts on
thousands of hectares of state forests and other protected areas that
have been granted in recent weeks had been approved already—before the
freeze was announced.
Tight
security was visible around the courthouse where the Boeung Kak 13’s
appeal came down. It seemed emblematic of Hun Sen’s distaste for being
challenged on this issue. A large stretch of the capital went into
lockdown in the hours before the verdict was announced. The fear had
been that protests mounted by supporters of the jailed women might
interrupt a state visit being paid by Japan’s Crown Prince Naruhito.
About
six city blocks along Sothearos boulevard and Sisowath quay, stretching
past the royal palace and the courts, were closed to traffic. About 200
protesters were kept a full kilometre from the court, along the banks
of the Tonle Sap. There they were confronted by 300 riot police,
military police and soldiers.
Sporadic
incidents of violence were reported around town but inside the cramped
courthouse the mood was optimistic nonetheless. International and local
pressure had raised expectations that the Boeung Kak 13 would be set
free.
The
hopefulness was partly due to Cambodia’s growing international stature.
Phnom Penh occupies the current chair of the Association of South-East
Asian Nations (ASEAN) and will shortly play host to a summit of foreign
ministers, which Mrs Clinton is expected to attend. Anything less than
the release of the imprisoned women would’ve been an international
embarrassment for the government.
The presiding judge, Seng
Sivutha, did not disappoint. He noted noting that the women, who
appeared before him in their prison blue, had children to look after
and that moreover they had little knowledge of the law. He reduced their prison terms to exactly one month and three days—exactly the time served—and so they were freed. Their conviction, however, stays on the books.
Khek
Chan Raksmey, a villager from Boeung Kak, was overwhelmed by the rare
sense of victory. “Long live, we won now. The court has released our
people.”
Source: economist
(Picture credit: AFP)
No comments:
Post a Comment